Finnish vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,023,518 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Finnish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.089. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Finns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Finns corresponds to an increase of 5.3 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Finnish and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,535 compared to $72,288, a difference of 21.4%), median household income ($83,607 compared to $100,151, a difference of 19.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,904 compared to $117,750, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 5.9%), householder income under 25 years ($51,827 compared to $57,078, a difference of 10.1%), and median male earnings ($54,721 compared to $61,759, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Finnish and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 22.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 22.3%), and single female poverty (21.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.37%), married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Finnish and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 23.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 19.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.78%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Finnish and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 21.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.7% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Finnish and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.7%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 13.6%), and divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.8% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.24%), married-couple households (48.1% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 0.16%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Finnish and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 30.4%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.7%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.2% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.30%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 35.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.6%).