Pima vs Bhutanese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Bhutanese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Bhutanese
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Bhutanese Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,413,778 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.007. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 2.6 Bhutanese.
Pima vs Bhutanese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $49,894, a difference of 62.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $117,750, a difference of 60.5%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $100,151, a difference of 58.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $57,078, a difference of 10.8%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $43,648, a difference of 23.6%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 27.8%).
Income Metric | Pima | Bhutanese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Exceptional $49,894 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Exceptional $119,800 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Exceptional $100,151 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Exceptional $52,297 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Exceptional $61,759 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Exceptional $43,648 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Exceptional $57,078 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Exceptional $109,520 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Exceptional $117,750 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Exceptional $72,288 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Tragic 27.0% |
Pima vs Bhutanese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 178.5%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 160.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (29.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 136.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 1.4%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 50.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 56.1%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Bhutanese |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Exceptional 18.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 25.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Pima vs Bhutanese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 169.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 134.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 134.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 29.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Bhutanese |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Pima vs Bhutanese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 14.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 9.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Bhutanese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Fair 36.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Excellent 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Excellent 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Exceptional 83.5% |
Pima vs Bhutanese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 97.6%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 84.7%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.13%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.67%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 15.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Bhutanese |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Fair 27.3% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Exceptional 49.3% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Pima vs Bhutanese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 62.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 13.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.86%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 0.96%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 5.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Bhutanese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 8.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Exceptional 59.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Pima vs Bhutanese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 85.9%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 42.7%, a difference of 83.9%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 76.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.0%), 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.0%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Bhutanese |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 93.0% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 91.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Exceptional 88.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Exceptional 70.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Exceptional 64.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 51.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Exceptional 42.7% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 17.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Pima vs Bhutanese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 79.6%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 69.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 64.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.2%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 13.4%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 15.7%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Bhutanese |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Excellent 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Good 47.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.4% |