Crow vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,979,191 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.145. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.030% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 30.4 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $117,750, a difference of 58.6%), median household income ($63,681 compared to $100,151, a difference of 57.3%), and per capita income ($31,729 compared to $49,894, a difference of 57.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $57,078, a difference of 21.4%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $43,648, a difference of 23.8%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $52,297, a difference of 35.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 133.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 132.1%), and family poverty (16.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 128.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 45.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 50.7%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 50.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 260.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 249.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 246.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 27.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 66.3%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 44.8%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.28%), family households (65.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.88%), and average family size (3.82 compared to 3.25, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 26.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.22%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 0.99%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 72.2%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 61.7%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 57.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.18%), 9th grade (96.1% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and 11th grade (92.9% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 48.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 32.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 4.6%), disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.6%).