Ethiopian vs Bhutanese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Bhutanese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ethiopians
Bhutanese
7,266
SOCIAL INDEX
70.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
126th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Bhutanese Integration in Ethiopian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,698,400 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.155. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to an increase of 19.2 Bhutanese.
Ethiopian vs Bhutanese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 23.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,736 compared to $117,750, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,824 compared to $109,520, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,243 compared to $43,648, a difference of 0.94%), median earnings ($49,572 compared to $52,297, a difference of 5.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,818 compared to $57,078, a difference of 6.1%).
Income Metric | Ethiopian | Bhutanese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,569 | Exceptional $49,894 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,251 | Exceptional $119,800 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,640 | Exceptional $100,151 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $49,572 | Exceptional $52,297 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,243 | Exceptional $61,759 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,243 | Exceptional $43,648 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,818 | Exceptional $57,078 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,824 | Exceptional $109,520 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,736 | Exceptional $117,750 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,989 | Exceptional $72,288 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.8% | Tragic 27.0% |
Ethiopian vs Bhutanese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (16.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 30.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 30.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.83%), single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 8.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.6%).
Poverty Metric | Ethiopian | Bhutanese |
Poverty | Average 12.2% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Males | Average 11.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Good 13.3% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Exceptional 18.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.4% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.5% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Average 16.3% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 13.5% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.7% | Exceptional 25.6% |
Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Ethiopian vs Bhutanese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.58%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.63%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Ethiopian | Bhutanese |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.8% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.6% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Ethiopian vs Bhutanese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ethiopian | Bhutanese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 69.3% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 82.0% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.2% | Fair 36.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Excellent 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.2% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.6% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.9% | Excellent 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.8% | Exceptional 83.5% |
Ethiopian vs Bhutanese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.0%), married-couple households (43.2% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 14.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.40%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 7.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Ethiopian | Bhutanese |
Family Households | Tragic 61.2% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Fair 27.3% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.2% | Exceptional 49.3% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.24 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.5% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.5% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Average 12.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.8% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Ethiopian vs Bhutanese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 35.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 24.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 11.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 20.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ethiopian | Bhutanese |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.5% | Exceptional 8.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.1% | Exceptional 59.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Ethiopian vs Bhutanese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 34.8%), master's degree (18.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 70.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (42.8% compared to 42.7%, a difference of 0.27%), 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.63%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.64%).
Education Level Metric | Ethiopian | Bhutanese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.4% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Poor 92.2% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 91.0% | Exceptional 93.0% |
High School Diploma | Fair 89.0% | Exceptional 91.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.0% | Exceptional 88.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Exceptional 70.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.9% | Exceptional 64.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.4% | Exceptional 51.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.8% | Exceptional 42.7% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.0% | Exceptional 17.2% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Ethiopian vs Bhutanese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 20.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.0%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.19%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.59%), and disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.62%).
Disability Metric | Ethiopian | Bhutanese |
Disability | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Excellent 11.0% |
Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.7% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.8% | Good 47.1% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.4% |