Shoshone vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,333,285 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ute within Shoshone communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.679. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Shoshone within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Shoshone corresponds to an increase of 5.9 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Ute communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 9.2%), householder income under 25 years ($48,720 compared to $49,997, a difference of 2.6%), and median male earnings ($47,930 compared to $48,899, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,062 compared to $82,166, a difference of 0.13%), median earnings ($40,932 compared to $41,051, a difference of 0.29%), and median family income ($87,872 compared to $87,596, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (22.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 23.8%), receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 18.8%), and male poverty (13.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 103.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (7.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 42.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.3% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 1.4%), female unemployment (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.3% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.8% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 0.98%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 13.0%), divorced or separated (14.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 11.1%), and births to unmarried women (35.3% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.0% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 0.21%), family households (63.8% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.83%), and married-couple households (43.9% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Ute communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 9.8%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.91%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Ute communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 45.6%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 21.5%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 88.3%), male disability (13.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 19.7%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.8%).