Sioux vs Ute Community Comparison

COMPARE

Sioux
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Sioux

Ute

Fair
Fair
2,469
SOCIAL INDEX
22.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
256th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ute Integration in Sioux Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,836,978 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute within Sioux communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sioux within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sioux corresponds to an increase of 29.8 Ute.
Sioux Integration in Ute Communities

Sioux vs Ute Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sioux and Ute communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.3% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 14.2%), per capita income ($33,921 compared to $36,651, a difference of 8.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($46,417 compared to $49,997, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,063 compared to $34,960, a difference of 0.29%), householder income over 65 years ($52,509 compared to $52,949, a difference of 0.84%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($81,750 compared to $83,937, a difference of 2.7%).
Sioux vs Ute Income
Income MetricSiouxUte
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$33,921
Tragic
$36,651
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,386
Tragic
$87,596
Median Household Income
Tragic
$67,792
Tragic
$72,402
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,448
Tragic
$41,051
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,566
Tragic
$48,899
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,063
Tragic
$34,960
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$46,417
Tragic
$49,997
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,089
Tragic
$82,166
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$81,750
Tragic
$83,937
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,509
Tragic
$52,949
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.3%
Tragic
27.8%

Sioux vs Ute Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sioux and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (22.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 41.6%), married-couple family poverty (8.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 35.1%), and family poverty (15.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.8% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 8.6%), single female poverty (31.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 12.4%).
Sioux vs Ute Poverty
Poverty MetricSiouxUte
Poverty
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
16.9%
Families
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
12.1%
Males
Tragic
18.7%
Tragic
16.2%
Females
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
17.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.6%
Tragic
25.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
23.0%
Tragic
17.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
26.9%
Tragic
23.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
25.2%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
25.3%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
25.6%
Tragic
21.8%
Single Males
Tragic
22.2%
Tragic
15.7%
Single Females
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
28.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
23.9%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.8%
Tragic
35.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
12.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
14.7%

Sioux vs Ute Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sioux and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (13.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 88.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 76.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 70.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.79%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.6%).
Sioux vs Ute Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSiouxUte
Unemployment
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Males
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
19.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
11.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.7%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors > 65
Fair
5.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
5.9%

Sioux vs Ute Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sioux and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.0% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (80.2% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.7% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 1.4%).
Sioux vs Ute Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSiouxUte
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.8%
Tragic
60.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.0%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.5%
Good
37.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.6%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
79.7%
Tragic
80.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
80.4%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.2%
Tragic
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.0%
Tragic
76.6%

Sioux vs Ute Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sioux and Ute communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.0% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 24.2%), single mother households (8.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 19.4%), and single father households (3.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.31%), family households (64.6% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and average family size (3.52 compared to 3.49, a difference of 0.74%).
Sioux vs Ute Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSiouxUte
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Average
64.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.5%
Tragic
44.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.52
Exceptional
3.49
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.5%
Tragic
7.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.9%
Tragic
43.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
41.0%
Poor
33.0%

Sioux vs Ute Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 9.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 0.37%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.8% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 0.47%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.7%).
Sioux vs Ute Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSiouxUte
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Tragic
11.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.8%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.6%
Exceptional
22.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.8%

Sioux vs Ute Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sioux and Ute communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 36.8%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.7%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (38.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.38%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.41%).
Sioux vs Ute Education Level
Education Level MetricSiouxUte
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Average
96.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Average
95.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Fair
93.4%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Tragic
91.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.6%
Tragic
89.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Tragic
86.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.6%
Tragic
81.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.4%
Tragic
60.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.0%
Tragic
53.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.5%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.1%
Tragic
30.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
11.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.0%

Sioux vs Ute Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 111.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 18.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Sioux vs Ute Disability
Disability MetricSiouxUte
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Tragic
12.9%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Exceptional
0.86%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.0%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.2%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
27.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.7%
Tragic
52.6%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Average
2.5%