Finnish vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,804,688 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ute within Finnish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.682. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Finns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.123% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Finns corresponds to an increase of 123.5 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Finnish and Ute communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,904 compared to $83,937, a difference of 19.0%), per capita income ($43,461 compared to $36,651, a difference of 18.6%), and median family income ($102,676 compared to $87,596, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($51,827 compared to $49,997, a difference of 3.7%), and median female earnings ($38,173 compared to $34,960, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Finnish and Ute communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 56.0%), male poverty (10.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 55.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.2%), single male poverty (13.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 15.3%), and single mother poverty (30.0% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Finnish and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 46.4%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 46.3%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Finnish and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.9% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 18.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Finnish and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 25.2%), single father households (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 23.3%), and average family size (3.09 compared to 3.49, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.3%), divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 51.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 19.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Finnish and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 54.8%), master's degree (14.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 20.8%), and associate's degree (46.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.41%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 84.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 19.1%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.51%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and female disability (12.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.4%).