Czechoslovakian vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,866,927 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ute within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.844. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.050% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 50.3 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $83,937, a difference of 20.8%), per capita income ($43,806 compared to $36,651, a difference of 19.5%), and median family income ($103,273 compared to $87,596, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $49,997, a difference of 2.5%), and median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $34,960, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (10.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 57.0%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 50.7%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 8.4%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 17.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 47.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 38.8%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 27.5%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 20.7%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.49, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.45%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 48.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 23.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 39.4%), master's degree (14.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 23.8%), and bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 75.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 18.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.18%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.7%).