Immigrants from Norway vs Ute Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Norway
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Norway

Ute

Good
Fair
7,420
SOCIAL INDEX
71.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
117th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ute Integration in Immigrants from Norway Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,750,718 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Ute within Immigrant from Norway communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.999. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Norway within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.225% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Norway corresponds to an increase of 224.5 Ute.
Immigrants from Norway Integration in Ute Communities

Immigrants from Norway vs Ute Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Ute communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,217 compared to $36,651, a difference of 42.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,669 compared to $83,937, a difference of 33.0%), and median family income ($115,847 compared to $87,596, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($50,984 compared to $49,997, a difference of 2.0%), and median female earnings ($42,837 compared to $34,960, a difference of 22.5%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Ute Income
Income MetricImmigrants from NorwayUte
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,217
Tragic
$36,651
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,847
Tragic
$87,596
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,846
Tragic
$72,402
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,758
Tragic
$41,051
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,628
Tragic
$48,899
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,837
Tragic
$34,960
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,984
Tragic
$49,997
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$106,629
Tragic
$82,166
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,669
Tragic
$83,937
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,118
Tragic
$52,949
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
27.8%

Immigrants from Norway vs Ute Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Ute communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (10.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 51.9%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 49.0%), and receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.0%), single father poverty (16.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.0%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Ute Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from NorwayUte
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
16.9%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
12.1%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
16.2%
Females
Excellent
12.8%
Tragic
17.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.4%
Tragic
25.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
17.9%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.3%
Tragic
23.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
21.8%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
15.7%
Single Females
Good
20.8%
Tragic
28.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Average
29.3%
Tragic
35.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.5%
Tragic
12.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
14.7%

Immigrants from Norway vs Ute Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 32.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 27.7%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.84%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.9%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Ute Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from NorwayUte
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.5%
Tragic
19.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Tragic
11.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.9%

Immigrants from Norway vs Ute Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.91%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 4.7%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Ute Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from NorwayUte
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.6%
Tragic
60.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.2%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.9%
Good
37.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Tragic
80.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Tragic
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.5%
Tragic
76.6%

Immigrants from Norway vs Ute Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 46.1%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 27.6%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.49, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 3.6%), married-couple households (46.5% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and currently married (47.2% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 7.6%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Ute Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from NorwayUte
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Average
64.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.5%
Tragic
44.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Exceptional
3.49
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.1%
Currently Married
Good
47.2%
Tragic
43.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.9%
Poor
33.0%

Immigrants from Norway vs Ute Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Ute communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 43.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 19.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.010%), no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.0%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Ute Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from NorwayUte
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
11.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.4%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
19.0%
Exceptional
22.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Exceptional
8.8%

Immigrants from Norway vs Ute Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Ute communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 60.6%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 49.5%), and bachelor's degree (44.5% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Ute Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from NorwayUte
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Average
96.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Average
95.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Fair
93.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Tragic
91.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
89.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.5%
Tragic
86.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Tragic
81.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.2%
Tragic
60.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.7%
Tragic
53.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.2%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.5%
Tragic
30.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.8%
Tragic
11.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%

Immigrants from Norway vs Ute Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 46.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 26.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.53%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Ute Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from NorwayUte
Disability
Good
11.6%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Average
11.3%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Exceptional
0.86%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.8%
Tragic
27.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Tragic
52.6%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Average
2.5%