Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,322,976 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ute within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.035. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 5.6 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $36,651, a difference of 41.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,914 compared to $83,937, a difference of 33.3%), and median family income ($116,165 compared to $87,596, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.8%), householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $49,997, a difference of 8.7%), and median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $34,960, a difference of 24.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (10.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 62.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 59.4%), and family poverty (7.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 57.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 10.4%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 14.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 40.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 34.0%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.58%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 45.7%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 33.5%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (26.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 51.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 22.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.44%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 58.3%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 44.8%), and bachelor's degree (44.0% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 38.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 34.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.5%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.8%).