Bhutanese vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,791,152 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Ute within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to an increase of 8.3 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ute communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $83,937, a difference of 40.3%), median household income ($100,151 compared to $72,402, a difference of 38.3%), and median family income ($119,800 compared to $87,596, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $49,997, a difference of 14.2%), and median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $34,960, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ute communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 76.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 71.9%), and male poverty (9.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 71.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 22.2%), single father poverty (15.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 23.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 30.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 49.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 35.2%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 40.2%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 34.6%), and births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.4%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.49, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 33.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 12.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ute communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 46.7%), bachelor's degree (42.7% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 38.1%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 36.0%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 35.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.2%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.3%).