Choctaw vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,653,116 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ute within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.375. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 18.1 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ute communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $49,997, a difference of 10.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $82,166, a difference of 5.1%), and median household income ($69,947 compared to $72,402, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $52,949, a difference of 0.21%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and per capita income ($35,999 compared to $36,651, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ute communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (14.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 12.9%), single father poverty (20.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and poverty (15.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 0.26%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 51.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 41.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.70%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ute communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 11.7%), divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 11.7%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.32%), family households (64.9% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.83%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 47.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 12.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ute communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 39.4%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.7%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 117.6%), ambulatory disability (8.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 39.3%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 0.22%), cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 10.5%).