Immigrants from Oceania vs Ute Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Ute
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Ute
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ute Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,960,277 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Ute within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.986. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.367% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 366.6 Ute.
Immigrants from Oceania vs Ute Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ute communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $83,937, a difference of 23.5%), per capita income ($45,220 compared to $36,651, a difference of 23.4%), and median household income ($89,100 compared to $72,402, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $49,997, a difference of 7.4%), wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 8.3%), and median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $48,899, a difference of 13.9%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Ute |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,220 | Tragic $36,651 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,453 | Tragic $87,596 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,100 | Tragic $72,402 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,617 | Tragic $41,051 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,712 | Tragic $48,899 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,297 | Tragic $34,960 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,680 | Tragic $49,997 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,623 | Tragic $82,166 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,705 | Tragic $83,937 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,416 | Tragic $52,949 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.6% | Tragic 27.8% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Ute Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ute communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (11.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 45.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 39.3%), and family poverty (8.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 10.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.5%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 19.9%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Ute |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Tragic 16.9% |
Families | Good 8.7% | Tragic 12.1% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 16.2% |
Females | Average 13.3% | Tragic 17.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Tragic 25.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Tragic 17.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.9% | Tragic 23.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Tragic 21.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Tragic 21.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.1% | Tragic 21.8% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 15.7% |
Single Females | Good 20.7% | Tragic 28.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.7% | Tragic 35.7% |
Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Tragic 6.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.4% | Tragic 12.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Ute Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 40.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 32.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Ute |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.3% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Tragic 19.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 11.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 9.0% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Ute Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 4.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Ute |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Tragic 60.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.9% | Good 37.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 80.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.0% | Tragic 78.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.9% | Tragic 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.1% | Tragic 76.6% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Ute Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 20.5%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 13.1%), and births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.14%), family households (64.9% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.87%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 5.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Ute |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Average 64.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Tragic 44.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.29 | Exceptional 3.49 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 3.0% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Currently Married | Average 46.5% | Tragic 43.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.6% | Poor 33.0% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Ute Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 19.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 14.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 4.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Ute |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.7% | Tragic 11.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.4% | Tragic 88.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.5% | Exceptional 56.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.8% | Exceptional 22.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Ute Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ute communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 25.2%), bachelor's degree (37.3% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 20.8%), and associate's degree (45.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.080%), 5th grade (97.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and 6th grade (96.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.34%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Ute |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Good 97.4% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Good 97.1% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Average 96.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Average 95.8% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.5% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Fair 93.4% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.2% | Tragic 91.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.9% | Tragic 89.0% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.8% | Tragic 86.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.5% | Tragic 81.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.6% | Tragic 60.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Tragic 53.8% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.3% | Tragic 30.9% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.7% | Tragic 11.7% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.6% | Tragic 4.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Ute Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 34.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 17.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.84%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and male disability (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Ute |
Disability | Fair 11.8% | Poor 11.9% |
Males | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 11.6% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 0.86% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 13.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 24.0% | Tragic 27.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.0% | Tragic 52.6% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Average 2.5% |