Immigrants from Oceania vs Ute Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Oceania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Oceania

Ute

Average
Fair
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ute Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,960,277 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Ute within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.986. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.367% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 366.6 Ute.
Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Ute Communities

Immigrants from Oceania vs Ute Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ute communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $83,937, a difference of 23.5%), per capita income ($45,220 compared to $36,651, a difference of 23.4%), and median household income ($89,100 compared to $72,402, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $49,997, a difference of 7.4%), wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 8.3%), and median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $48,899, a difference of 13.9%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Ute Income
Income MetricImmigrants from OceaniaUte
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,220
Tragic
$36,651
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,453
Tragic
$87,596
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,100
Tragic
$72,402
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,617
Tragic
$41,051
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,712
Tragic
$48,899
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,297
Tragic
$34,960
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,680
Tragic
$49,997
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,623
Tragic
$82,166
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,705
Tragic
$83,937
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,416
Tragic
$52,949
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.6%
Tragic
27.8%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Ute Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ute communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (11.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 45.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 39.3%), and family poverty (8.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 10.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.5%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 19.9%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Ute Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from OceaniaUte
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Tragic
16.9%
Families
Good
8.7%
Tragic
12.1%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
16.2%
Females
Average
13.3%
Tragic
17.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.7%
Tragic
25.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Tragic
17.9%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.9%
Tragic
23.5%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
16.0%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Tragic
21.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
15.7%
Single Females
Good
20.7%
Tragic
28.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Good
28.7%
Tragic
35.7%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.4%
Tragic
14.7%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Ute Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 40.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 32.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.5%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Ute Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from OceaniaUte
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Males
Average
5.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Tragic
19.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
5.9%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Ute Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 4.2%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Ute Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from OceaniaUte
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
60.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
37.9%
Good
37.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
80.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
76.6%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Ute Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 20.5%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 13.1%), and births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.14%), family households (64.9% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.87%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 5.6%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Ute Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from OceaniaUte
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Average
64.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.9%
Tragic
44.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Exceptional
3.49
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Tragic
7.1%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Tragic
43.9%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.6%
Poor
33.0%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Ute Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 19.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 14.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 4.0%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Ute Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from OceaniaUte
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Tragic
11.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.5%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.8%
Exceptional
22.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
8.8%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Ute Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ute communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 25.2%), bachelor's degree (37.3% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 20.8%), and associate's degree (45.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.080%), 5th grade (97.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and 6th grade (96.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.34%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Ute Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from OceaniaUte
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Average
96.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Average
95.8%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Fair
93.4%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Tragic
91.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.9%
Tragic
89.0%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.8%
Tragic
86.2%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.5%
Tragic
81.8%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.6%
Tragic
60.2%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
53.8%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.3%
Tragic
30.9%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.7%
Tragic
11.7%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Exceptional
2.0%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Ute Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 34.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 17.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.84%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and male disability (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Ute Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from OceaniaUte
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Fair
11.4%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Good
12.1%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
0.86%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Tragic
27.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Tragic
52.6%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Average
2.5%