Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,798,384 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Romania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.101. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Romania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Romania corresponds to a decrease of 16.7 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,713 compared to $128,140, a difference of 22.4%), median household income ($94,222 compared to $111,519, a difference of 18.4%), and median female earnings ($42,718 compared to $49,818, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 5.9%), householder income over 65 years ($64,462 compared to $71,567, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,522 compared to $62,083, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 21.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 18.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and male poverty (9.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 19.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.070%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 19.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.83%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 18.3%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.70%), currently married (48.4% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.99%), and family households (64.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.060%), no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.99%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 41.2%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 30.2%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.5% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.63%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.79%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 24.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.60%), disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.3%).