Immigrants from Jamaica vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,749,738 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Jamaica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.543. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jamaica within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jamaica corresponds to a decrease of 7.5 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,298 compared to $128,140, a difference of 53.8%), median household income ($75,851 compared to $111,519, a difference of 47.0%), and median family income ($89,268 compared to $131,067, a difference of 46.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,038 compared to $62,083, a difference of 21.6%), median female earnings ($38,625 compared to $49,818, a difference of 29.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,027 compared to $71,567, a difference of 32.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 85.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 64.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 64.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 8.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 19.4%), and single father poverty (17.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 20.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 54.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 37.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 72.9%), births to unmarried women (38.8% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 64.6%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.3%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 46.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 30.5%), and no vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.8% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.5% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 18.2%), and no vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 25.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 103.0%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 79.7%), and master's degree (13.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.4% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.050%), 8th grade (94.9% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and 5th grade (96.8% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 43.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 42.2%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 9.7%).