Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from Hong Kong
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,814,236 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.397. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.188% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 187.5 Immigrants from Hong Kong.
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $128,140, a difference of 30.9%), median household income ($89,496 compared to $111,519, a difference of 24.6%), and median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $70,146, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 0.76%), householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $71,567, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $62,083, a difference of 19.6%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,394 | Exceptional $56,709 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,830 | Exceptional $131,067 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,496 | Exceptional $111,519 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,913 | Exceptional $59,433 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,352 | Exceptional $70,146 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,527 | Exceptional $49,818 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,914 | Exceptional $62,083 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,880 | Exceptional $128,140 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $104,992 | Exceptional $127,500 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,643 | Exceptional $71,567 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.3% | Good 25.5% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 27.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 23.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 7.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 9.4%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.8% | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.8% | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Single Males | Good 12.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 20.0% | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Single Fathers | Good 16.1% | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.1% | Exceptional 24.4% |
| Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Fair 11.1% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 12.8% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.5%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.2% |
| Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.2% |
| Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.1% |
| Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Average 11.6% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Good 17.4% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Poor 10.5% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Average 4.5% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.0% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.2% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Excellent 5.3% |
| Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.1% |
| Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 7.6% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 24.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.8% | Exceptional 65.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Exceptional 80.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Tragic 30.5% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.9% | Tragic 71.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Exceptional 85.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 85.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.2% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Exceptional 83.6% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 28.7%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 27.5%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (63.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.2%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Good 27.5% |
| Married-couple Households | Average 46.3% | Exceptional 49.6% |
| Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Excellent 3.26 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Single Mother Households | Good 6.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Currently Married | Average 46.7% | Exceptional 48.9% |
| Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.3% | Exceptional 23.6% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 14.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.28%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 5.7%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Tragic 11.3% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.2% | Tragic 88.7% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.6% | Tragic 52.6% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Fair 19.2% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Good 6.5% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 44.9%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.0%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.1% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.21%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.1% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.84%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.85%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.7% |
| Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.4% |
| Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
| 1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.3% |
| 2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.2% |
| 3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.1% |
| 4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.9% |
| 5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.7% |
| 6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 96.3% |
| 7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 95.2% |
| 8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 94.9% |
| 9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 94.1% |
| 10th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Tragic 93.1% |
| 11th Grade | Exceptional 93.4% | Fair 92.2% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.1% | Good 91.3% |
| High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.3% | Average 89.3% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.1% | Exceptional 86.9% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.9% | Exceptional 71.0% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 63.3% | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.5% | Exceptional 55.4% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.6% | Exceptional 48.2% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.4% | Exceptional 20.5% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 6.4% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 29.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 28.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.5%), ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.2%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 0.95% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.3% | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.2% | Exceptional 46.5% |
| Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Hearing | Good 3.0% | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Cognitive | Poor 17.5% | Exceptional 16.0% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.4% |