Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Oceania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Oceania

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Average
Good
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,640,151 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.620. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.054% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 54.2 Immigrants from Hong Kong.
Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,623 compared to $128,140, a difference of 31.3%), median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $70,146, a difference of 25.9%), and per capita income ($45,220 compared to $56,709, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 0.44%), householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $71,567, a difference of 11.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $62,083, a difference of 15.7%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income
Income MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Hong Kong
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,220
Exceptional
$56,709
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,453
Exceptional
$131,067
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,100
Exceptional
$111,519
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,617
Exceptional
$59,433
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,712
Exceptional
$70,146
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,297
Exceptional
$49,818
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,680
Exceptional
$62,083
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,623
Exceptional
$128,140
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,705
Exceptional
$127,500
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,416
Exceptional
$71,567
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.6%
Good
25.5%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 36.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 30.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 6.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 8.4%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Hong Kong
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Exceptional
10.4%
Families
Good
8.7%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Average
11.2%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Average
13.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.7%
Exceptional
17.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Exceptional
10.4%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.9%
Exceptional
12.4%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
12.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
16.0%
Exceptional
12.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.4%
Exceptional
10.4%
Single Females
Good
20.7%
Exceptional
16.5%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Mothers
Good
28.7%
Exceptional
24.4%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.4%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.4%
Exceptional
9.1%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 29.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 17.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.75%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.94%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Hong Kong
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Good
5.2%
Males
Average
5.3%
Good
5.2%
Females
Good
5.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Good
17.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Exceptional
7.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Exceptional
5.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 24.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Hong Kong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Exceptional
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
37.9%
Tragic
30.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Tragic
71.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
83.6%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 34.2%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 29.9%), and births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.0%), family households (64.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Hong Kong
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Exceptional
66.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
49.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Excellent
3.26
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.6%
Exceptional
23.6%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.7%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 13.8%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Hong Kong
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Tragic
11.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.5%
Tragic
52.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.8%
Fair
19.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Good
6.5%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 45.3%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 40.3%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.010%), 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.32%), and 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.43%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Hong Kong
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Tragic
2.7%
Nursery School
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
97.3%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Tragic
94.1%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.9%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.8%
Average
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.5%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.6%
Exceptional
71.0%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Exceptional
55.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.3%
Exceptional
48.2%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.7%
Exceptional
20.5%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
6.4%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Exceptional
2.8%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 38.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.3%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 9.8%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Hong Kong
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Males
Fair
11.4%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Exceptional
8.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Exceptional
19.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.0%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Exceptional
2.4%