Austrian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 238,458,580 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Austrian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.828. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Austrians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.090% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Austrians corresponds to an increase of 90.3 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,842 compared to $128,140, a difference of 25.8%), median household income ($91,339 compared to $111,519, a difference of 22.1%), and median female earnings ($40,923 compared to $49,818, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,470 compared to $71,567, a difference of 11.0%), wage/income gap (28.4% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,692 compared to $127,500, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 29.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 26.0%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 6.1%), poverty (11.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 32.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 26.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.84%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.5% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 29.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 31.7%), single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 21.1%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.7% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.40%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and married-couple households (48.6% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 28.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 64.2%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 32.0%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.7% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.88%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 52.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 36.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.86%), disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 3.4%).