Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 244,005,402 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.031. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 0.9 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($109,520 compared to $128,140, a difference of 17.0%), median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $49,818, a difference of 14.1%), and per capita income ($49,894 compared to $56,709, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $71,567, a difference of 1.0%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $127,500, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 21.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 18.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.22%), female poverty (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.57%), and male poverty (9.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 19.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.99%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 18.2%), single father households (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 15.3%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.27%), family households (65.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.44%), and currently married (48.6% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 29.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 50.1%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 19.5%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (70.3% compared to 71.0%, a difference of 0.91%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.92%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 23.5%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 20.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.29%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 3.4%).