Scottish vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,800,296 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.635. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.051% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to an increase of 51.3 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,622 compared to $128,140, a difference of 35.4%), median household income ($85,101 compared to $111,519, a difference of 31.0%), and median female earnings ($38,397 compared to $49,818, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 14.1%), householder income over 65 years ($61,735 compared to $71,567, a difference of 15.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,554 compared to $62,083, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 35.8%), single male poverty (14.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 33.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 8.6%), male poverty (10.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and family poverty (7.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 36.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 32.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 37.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 34.6%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 26.7%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.2% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.67%), married-couple households (49.0% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 67.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 18.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 5.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 91.2%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 40.7%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.7% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.83%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 73.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 50.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.59%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 5.6%).