Crow vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,333,885 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.998. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.105% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 105.4 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,337 compared to $128,140, a difference of 79.6%), per capita income ($31,729 compared to $56,709, a difference of 78.7%), and median household income ($63,681 compared to $111,519, a difference of 75.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $62,083, a difference of 32.1%), wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 33.9%), and median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $49,818, a difference of 41.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 149.4%), single male poverty (23.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 122.7%), and family poverty (16.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 122.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 24.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 37.5%), and receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 47.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 257.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 230.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 229.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 28.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 26.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 13.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 91.8%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 71.2%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.66%), family households (65.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.82 compared to 3.26, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 17.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.62%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 102.9%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 92.4%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 87.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.70%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.93%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 78.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 58.7%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.3%), disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 8.2%).