Immigrants from Syria vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,843,983 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Syria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Syria within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Syria corresponds to a decrease of 4.2 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,789 compared to $128,140, a difference of 32.4%), median household income ($88,792 compared to $111,519, a difference of 25.6%), and per capita income ($45,218 compared to $56,709, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 3.3%), householder income over 65 years ($62,303 compared to $71,567, a difference of 14.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,494 compared to $62,083, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 35.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 34.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 35.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 26.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.64%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 27.9%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 24.5%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.10%), family households (65.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 17.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 42.4%), professional degree (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 30.4%), and master's degree (16.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.090%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.1% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and high school diploma (89.0% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 30.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 20.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.8% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.8%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.8%).