European vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,004,706 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within European communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.649. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Europeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.100% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Europeans corresponds to an increase of 99.9 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 28.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,367 compared to $91,385, a difference of 16.4%), and per capita income ($45,836 compared to $39,827, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,457 compared to $38,028, a difference of 3.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,796 compared to $48,749, a difference of 6.2%), and median earnings ($47,915 compared to $43,998, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 42.6%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 36.2%), and receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.0%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 25.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.1% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 0.98%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 23.4%), married-couple households (49.6% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 14.2%), and currently married (49.3% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.38%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.75%), and family households (65.0% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 46.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 13.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 112.7%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 22.2%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 34.9%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.10%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.86%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.88%).