Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Excellent
Fair
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,852,584 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.309. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.061% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 60.9 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.
Luxembourger Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 20.1%), per capita income ($45,663 compared to $39,827, a difference of 14.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $91,385, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $48,749, a difference of 3.3%), median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $38,028, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $57,114, a difference of 6.8%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Tragic
$39,827
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Tragic
$94,472
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Tragic
$78,682
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Tragic
$43,998
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Tragic
$50,298
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Tragic
$38,028
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Tragic
$48,749
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Tragic
$86,736
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Tragic
$91,385
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Tragic
$57,114
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
22.8%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 55.3%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 45.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.9%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
10.5%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
20.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
19.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
19.7%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Fair
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
12.9%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.8%), female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.3%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.41%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
15.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.4%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.6%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Exceptional
39.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Exceptional
76.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
82.0%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 26.8%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 11.7%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.29, a difference of 6.0%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
62.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
43.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
44.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Poor
32.9%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 94.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 5.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 9.5%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Average
89.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Fair
6.2%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 98.0%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 16.9%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
93.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
91.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
90.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
88.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
86.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
83.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
62.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
56.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
43.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
35.5%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Tragic
13.5%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Poor
1.7%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 16.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 16.0%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.50%), male disability (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.66%), and disability (11.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 4.2%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Good
11.1%
Average
11.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Average
2.5%