Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,705,600 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.285. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 4.4 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $91,385, a difference of 28.8%), median household income ($100,151 compared to $78,682, a difference of 27.3%), and median family income ($119,800 compared to $94,472, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $38,028, a difference of 14.8%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $48,749, a difference of 17.1%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 54.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (12.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 54.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 10.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.0%), and single male poverty (11.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 9.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 33.5%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 17.9%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and family households (65.9% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.9%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 19.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 74.6%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 37.8%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 24.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.7%), male disability (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.4%).