Apache vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

COMPARE

Apache
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Apache

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Poor
Fair
1,423
SOCIAL INDEX
11.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
309th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Apache Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,592,110 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Apache communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.979. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Apache within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.140% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Apache corresponds to an increase of 139.8 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.
Apache Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

Apache vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,886 compared to $39,827, a difference of 14.2%), median family income ($84,451 compared to $94,472, a difference of 11.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,184 compared to $91,385, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,395 compared to $48,749, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($54,668 compared to $57,114, a difference of 4.5%), and wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 7.5%).
Apache vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income
Income MetricApacheImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$34,886
Tragic
$39,827
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,451
Tragic
$94,472
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,927
Tragic
$78,682
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,388
Tragic
$43,998
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,429
Tragic
$50,298
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,895
Tragic
$38,028
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,395
Tragic
$48,749
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,260
Tragic
$86,736
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,184
Tragic
$91,385
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,668
Tragic
$57,114
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.5%
Exceptional
22.8%

Apache vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 64.4%), married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 48.7%), and single father poverty (24.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 19.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (23.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 21.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 22.0%).
Apache vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty
Poverty MetricApacheImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Poverty
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
14.2%
Families
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
10.5%
Males
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
15.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
26.3%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
20.1%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
25.0%
Tragic
20.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
23.8%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
24.5%
Tragic
19.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
23.8%
Tragic
19.7%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
24.2%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.6%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.9%
Fair
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.3%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
12.9%

Apache vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 82.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (12.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 67.9%), and male unemployment (8.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 65.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 14.9%).
Apache vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment
Unemployment MetricApacheImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Unemployment
Tragic
7.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
8.6%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
15.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.9%
Good
5.4%

Apache vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.7% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 6.9%).
Apache vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricApacheImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.7%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.6%
Exceptional
39.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.0%
Exceptional
76.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
79.2%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
77.9%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.1%
Tragic
82.0%

Apache vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.9% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 21.3%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.0%), and single mother households (7.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.9% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (43.2% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.5%).
Apache vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure
Family Structure MetricApacheImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Family Households
Exceptional
66.5%
Tragic
62.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.0%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.9%
Tragic
43.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.46
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Tragic
44.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
39.9%
Poor
32.9%

Apache vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 12.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.61%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.8%).
Apache vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricApacheImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.1%
Average
89.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
55.1%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.2%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Fair
6.2%

Apache vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 51.7%), bachelor's degree (28.3% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 25.5%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (90.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.060%), 10th grade (92.6% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.83%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
Apache vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level
Education Level MetricApacheImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Good
97.9%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Good
97.8%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Good
97.6%
Tragic
96.3%
5th Grade
Average
97.4%
Tragic
96.1%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Poor
95.5%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Tragic
93.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Tragic
91.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Tragic
90.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.3%
Tragic
88.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Tragic
86.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.7%
Tragic
83.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
58.0%
Tragic
62.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.8%
Tragic
56.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.2%
Tragic
43.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.3%
Tragic
35.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
13.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Poor
1.7%

Apache vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 80.3%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 39.3%), and vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.1%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and female disability (13.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 10.4%).
Apache vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability
Disability MetricApacheImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Disability
Tragic
13.9%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Tragic
14.0%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
13.7%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.0%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.4%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.4%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
29.7%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
53.6%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Tragic
3.0%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.6%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.4%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Average
2.5%