Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Congo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Congo

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Fair
Fair
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,469,537 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.276. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.583% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 583.1 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.
Immigrants from Congo Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $86,736, a difference of 20.2%), median household income ($66,768 compared to $78,682, a difference of 17.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($77,850 compared to $91,385, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 5.3%), median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $38,028, a difference of 10.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,393 compared to $57,114, a difference of 11.1%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CongoImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,720
Tragic
$39,827
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,216
Tragic
$94,472
Median Household Income
Tragic
$66,768
Tragic
$78,682
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,169
Tragic
$43,998
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$44,204
Tragic
$50,298
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,317
Tragic
$38,028
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$43,266
Tragic
$48,749
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$72,178
Tragic
$86,736
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$77,850
Tragic
$91,385
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,393
Tragic
$57,114
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
22.8%

Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 17.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (22.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 16.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.2%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CongoImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Poverty
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
14.2%
Families
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
10.5%
Males
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Tragic
17.4%
Tragic
15.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.6%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.9%
Tragic
20.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
22.4%
Tragic
19.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
19.7%
Single Males
Tragic
13.9%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
25.3%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.8%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Fair
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
12.9%

Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 20.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 15.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.31%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.6%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CongoImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Average
5.3%
Good
5.2%
Females
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
15.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.57%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CongoImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.7%
Exceptional
39.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Exceptional
76.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
82.0%

Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.1%), births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 11.9%), and married-couple households (39.0% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.9%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.3%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CongoImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Family Households
Tragic
59.2%
Tragic
62.6%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
39.0%
Tragic
43.4%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.1%
Tragic
44.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.8%
Poor
32.9%

Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.39%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.6%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CongoImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Average
89.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.1%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.0%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Fair
6.2%

Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 31.6%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.080%), 12th grade, no diploma (89.0% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and high school diploma (87.0% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 0.40%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CongoImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
96.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
96.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Tragic
93.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Tragic
91.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Tragic
90.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Tragic
88.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Tragic
86.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Tragic
83.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.7%
Tragic
62.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.6%
Tragic
56.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.8%
Tragic
43.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.6%
Tragic
35.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
13.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Poor
1.7%

Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CongoImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Tragic
11.7%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.0%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.7%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.2%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Average
2.5%