Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Oceania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Oceania

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Average
Fair
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,640,604 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.429. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to a decrease of 10.2 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.
Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,220 compared to $39,827, a difference of 13.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $91,385, a difference of 13.5%), and median household income ($89,100 compared to $78,682, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $38,028, a difference of 6.0%), median earnings ($47,617 compared to $43,998, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $48,749, a difference of 10.1%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income
Income MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,220
Tragic
$39,827
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,453
Tragic
$94,472
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,100
Tragic
$78,682
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,617
Tragic
$43,998
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,712
Tragic
$50,298
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,297
Tragic
$38,028
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,680
Tragic
$48,749
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,623
Tragic
$86,736
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,705
Tragic
$91,385
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,416
Tragic
$57,114
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.6%
Exceptional
22.8%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (16.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 22.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 21.8%), and family poverty (8.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.5%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 6.6%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Tragic
14.2%
Families
Good
8.7%
Tragic
10.5%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Average
13.3%
Tragic
15.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.7%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.9%
Tragic
20.4%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
16.0%
Tragic
19.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Tragic
19.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.4%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Good
20.7%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Good
28.7%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.4%
Fair
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.4%
Tragic
12.9%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.93%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Average
5.3%
Good
5.2%
Females
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
15.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.81%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 0.28%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
37.9%
Exceptional
39.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Exceptional
76.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
82.0%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.2%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.030%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
62.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.9%
Tragic
43.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Tragic
44.3%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.6%
Poor
32.9%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 15.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.77%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 6.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 7.0%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Average
89.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.5%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.8%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Fair
6.2%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 40.1%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 15.7%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.98%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.99%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.0%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
96.3%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Tragic
96.1%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Tragic
93.1%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Tragic
91.8%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Tragic
90.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.9%
Tragic
88.9%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.8%
Tragic
86.7%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.5%
Tragic
83.0%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.6%
Tragic
62.5%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
56.6%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Tragic
43.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.3%
Tragic
35.5%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.7%
Tragic
13.5%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Poor
1.7%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 8.0%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 0.26%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and disability (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.30%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Fair
11.4%
Average
11.2%
Females
Good
12.1%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Average
2.5%