Choctaw vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,794,209 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.509. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.117% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 117.1 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 23.2%), median female earnings ($33,775 compared to $38,028, a difference of 12.6%), and median household income ($69,947 compared to $78,682, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $50,298, a difference of 5.4%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $48,749, a difference of 7.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $57,114, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (17.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 29.4%), single father poverty (20.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 25.9%), and single female poverty (27.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 33.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 32.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.3%), births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 12.2%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.090%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 32.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 73.5%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 22.6%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.15%), 12th grade, no diploma (89.8% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and high school diploma (87.8% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 66.1%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 54.9%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 51.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.8%).