Pima vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,565,537 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.822. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.205% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 1,205.2 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $39,827, a difference of 30.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $91,385, a difference of 24.6%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $78,682, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $86,736, a difference of 4.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $48,749, a difference of 5.7%), and median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $38,028, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 98.0%), married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 89.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (19.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 76.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 11.5%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 26.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 31.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 155.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 151.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 117.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 8.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 35.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 15.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 10.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 72.3%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 56.6%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.4%), family households (65.9% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 35.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 3.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 52.9%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 48.6%), and master's degree (9.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.2% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.73%), 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.84%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 60.7%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 52.6%), and ambulatory disability (8.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.8%).