Crow vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,276,711 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.919. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.121% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 1,121.3 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $39,827, a difference of 25.5%), median household income ($63,681 compared to $78,682, a difference of 23.5%), and median family income ($76,605 compared to $94,472, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $48,749, a difference of 3.7%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $38,028, a difference of 7.8%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $43,998, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 83.9%), single male poverty (23.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 77.2%), and married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 58.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.3%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 26.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 32.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 263.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 261.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 240.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 12.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 23.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 30.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 45.1%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 22.8%), and average family size (3.82 compared to 3.29, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.4%), family households (65.3% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 19.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.41%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 91.8%), bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 27.9%), and master's degree (10.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.91%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and high school diploma (88.4% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 41.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 21.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.1%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.3%).