Canadian vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 286,393,822 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.633. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.132% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 131.6 Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,858 compared to $39,403, a difference of 16.4%), median male earnings ($57,286 compared to $50,488, a difference of 13.5%), and wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,336 compared to $53,078, a difference of 1.4%), median household income ($87,769 compared to $84,729, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,230 compared to $64,920, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 22.5%), single father poverty (17.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 13.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 0.36%), single female poverty (21.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 0.50%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 16.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.0%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.7%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.4%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.41, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.2% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.76%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and currently married (48.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 30.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 15.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.25%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 36.1%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 35.8%), and master's degree (15.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.50%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.50%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 21.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 11.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.51%), disability (12.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.58%), and female disability (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.58%).