Luxembourger vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hawaiian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Hawaiians

Excellent
Fair
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,537
SOCIAL INDEX
32.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
218th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hawaiian Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,546,312 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.371. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.229% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 228.6 Hawaiians.
Luxembourger Integration in Hawaiian Communities

Luxembourger vs Hawaiian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,663 compared to $39,403, a difference of 15.9%), median male earnings ($56,300 compared to $50,488, a difference of 11.5%), and wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($86,418 compared to $84,729, a difference of 2.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $98,778, a difference of 4.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $53,078, a difference of 5.4%).
Luxembourger vs Hawaiian Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerHawaiian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Tragic
$39,403
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Poor
$98,869
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Average
$84,729
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Tragic
$43,673
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Tragic
$50,488
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Tragic
$37,497
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Excellent
$53,078
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Poor
$90,722
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Fair
$98,778
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Exceptional
$64,920
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Excellent
24.9%

Luxembourger vs Hawaiian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 41.4%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 32.6%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 2.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and single female poverty (20.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 3.6%).
Luxembourger vs Hawaiian Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerHawaiian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Fair
12.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Average
9.0%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Fair
13.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Poor
14.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Average
17.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Average
16.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Average
16.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Fair
21.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Average
29.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
12.9%

Luxembourger vs Hawaiian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 26.5%), male unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.9%).
Luxembourger vs Hawaiian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerHawaiian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Fair
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.5%

Luxembourger vs Hawaiian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 17.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.8%).
Luxembourger vs Hawaiian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerHawaiian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Exceptional
38.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
83.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
81.5%

Luxembourger vs Hawaiian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 19.2%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.7%), and births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.3%), currently married (49.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 6.2%).
Luxembourger vs Hawaiian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerHawaiian
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
67.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
28.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.41
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Poor
33.2%

Luxembourger vs Hawaiian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 50.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 35.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 2.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 16.2%).
Luxembourger vs Hawaiian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerHawaiian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
8.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
92.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Exceptional
60.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
24.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
8.9%

Luxembourger vs Hawaiian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 36.0%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 34.1%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.61%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.63%).
Luxembourger vs Hawaiian Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerHawaiian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Poor
95.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Poor
95.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Fair
94.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Poor
90.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Poor
88.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Poor
85.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
62.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
55.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
40.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
31.6%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Tragic
11.6%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%

Luxembourger vs Hawaiian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 19.4%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.7%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.67%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 6.8%).
Luxembourger vs Hawaiian Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerHawaiian
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
25.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
49.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%