Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,834,560 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.575. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 10.448% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 10,447.7 Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,394 compared to $39,403, a difference of 20.3%), median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $50,488, a difference of 13.6%), and median earnings ($48,913 compared to $43,673, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 1.8%), householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $64,920, a difference of 2.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $53,078, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 29.8%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.17%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and single mother poverty (28.1% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.5%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.92%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 18.6%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 9.5%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.14%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 47.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 27.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 22.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 53.1%), master's degree (17.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 50.5%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 17.1%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.19%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.1%).