Immigrants from Oceania vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 240,956,662 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.906. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.945% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 945.3 Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,220 compared to $39,403, a difference of 14.8%), median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $50,488, a difference of 10.3%), and median earnings ($47,617 compared to $43,673, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $64,920, a difference of 0.78%), householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $53,078, a difference of 1.1%), and wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 13.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.7%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 8.6%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 8.2%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.15%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 21.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 32.7%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 30.6%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 8.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and male disability (11.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 2.5%).