Crow vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,931,247 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.348. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 23.8 Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($63,681 compared to $84,729, a difference of 33.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $98,778, a difference of 33.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $64,920, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $37,497, a difference of 6.3%), median earnings ($38,707 compared to $43,673, a difference of 12.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $53,078, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 100.8%), married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 85.9%), and single male poverty (23.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 84.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.9%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 32.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 43.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 211.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 207.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (13.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 202.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 32.2%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 21.5%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 3.3%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and average family size (3.82 compared to 3.41, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 37.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 14.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 3.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 8.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.8%), bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 14.0%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.23%), 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.67%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 20.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 19.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.12%), disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 0.84%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.5%).