Czechoslovakian vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hawaiian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechoslovakians

Hawaiians

Good
Fair
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,537
SOCIAL INDEX
32.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
218th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hawaiian Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 246,115,337 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.319. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.102% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 102.4 Hawaiians.
Czechoslovakian Integration in Hawaiian Communities

Czechoslovakian vs Hawaiian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 13.3%), per capita income ($43,806 compared to $39,403, a difference of 11.2%), and median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $50,488, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($84,965 compared to $84,729, a difference of 0.28%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $98,778, a difference of 2.6%), and median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $37,497, a difference of 3.3%).
Czechoslovakian vs Hawaiian Income
Income MetricCzechoslovakianHawaiian
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,806
Tragic
$39,403
Median Family Income
Average
$103,273
Poor
$98,869
Median Household Income
Average
$84,965
Average
$84,729
Median Earnings
Average
$46,658
Tragic
$43,673
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,382
Tragic
$50,488
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,738
Tragic
$37,497
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,224
Excellent
$53,078
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$95,070
Poor
$90,722
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,387
Fair
$98,778
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,581
Exceptional
$64,920
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.2%
Excellent
24.9%

Czechoslovakian vs Hawaiian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 25.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.2%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 0.70%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
Czechoslovakian vs Hawaiian Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechoslovakianHawaiian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Fair
12.5%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Average
9.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Fair
13.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
20.0%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Poor
14.1%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.8%
Average
17.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Average
16.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Average
16.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Fair
21.3%
Fair
21.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Average
29.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
12.9%

Czechoslovakian vs Hawaiian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.0%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.8%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.9%).
Czechoslovakian vs Hawaiian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechoslovakianHawaiian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Fair
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Average
5.5%

Czechoslovakian vs Hawaiian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.0%).
Czechoslovakian vs Hawaiian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechoslovakianHawaiian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.5%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.9%
Exceptional
38.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.5%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Tragic
83.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
81.5%

Czechoslovakian vs Hawaiian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.5%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 12.1%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.41, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.5%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 3.7%).
Czechoslovakian vs Hawaiian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechoslovakianHawaiian
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Exceptional
67.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
28.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Exceptional
3.41
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.0%
Poor
33.2%

Czechoslovakian vs Hawaiian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 25.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 11.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.30%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.7%).
Czechoslovakian vs Hawaiian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechoslovakianHawaiian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Exceptional
60.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
24.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
8.9%

Czechoslovakian vs Hawaiian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 33.3%), master's degree (14.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 25.2%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.57%).
Czechoslovakian vs Hawaiian Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechoslovakianHawaiian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Fair
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Poor
95.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Poor
95.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Fair
94.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.1%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Poor
90.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Poor
88.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.4%
Poor
85.0%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.8%
Tragic
62.1%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
55.6%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.0%
Tragic
40.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Tragic
31.6%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.5%
Tragic
11.6%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.5%

Czechoslovakian vs Hawaiian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 24.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 11.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.18%), disability (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.39%).
Czechoslovakian vs Hawaiian Disability
Disability MetricCzechoslovakianHawaiian
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Tragic
25.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Tragic
49.2%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%