Bhutanese vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 302,021,259 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.071% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to an increase of 71.1 Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,894 compared to $39,403, a difference of 26.6%), median male earnings ($61,759 compared to $50,488, a difference of 22.3%), and median family income ($119,800 compared to $98,869, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $53,078, a difference of 7.5%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 8.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $64,920, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 40.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 31.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.74%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.5%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 25.9%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 25.0%), and births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 2.4%), married-couple households (49.3% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and currently married (48.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 14.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.73%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 58.7%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 58.0%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 25.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 18.8%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.2%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 6.2%).