Pima vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,179,480 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.671. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 15.9 Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $98,778, a difference of 34.6%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $84,729, a difference of 33.9%), and per capita income ($30,644 compared to $39,403, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $53,078, a difference of 3.1%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $37,497, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $90,722, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 121.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 115.0%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 103.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 2.1%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 32.2%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 43.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 133.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 120.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 114.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 12.7%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 57.0%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 55.0%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 2.2%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 75.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 16.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 6.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 36.3%), associate's degree (30.2% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 35.4%), and master's degree (9.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.11%), 6th grade (97.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 51.2%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 45.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.6%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 6.8%).