Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 313,224,346 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.168. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 6.0 Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,806 compared to $39,403, a difference of 36.5%), median male earnings ($66,903 compared to $50,488, a difference of 32.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($118,056 compared to $90,722, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,123 compared to $53,078, a difference of 7.6%), householder income over 65 years ($69,872 compared to $64,920, a difference of 7.6%), and wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 38.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 28.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.80%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 29.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 19.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 40.8%), births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 32.6%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.8% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.9%), currently married (48.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 68.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 43.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 6.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 28.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 102.6%), professional degree (6.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 90.7%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 79.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.6% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.030%), 8th grade (95.4% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 40.4%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 29.5%), and male disability (9.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.7%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.2%).