Uruguayan vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,368,638 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.057. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to a decrease of 12.9 Ghanaians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 12.6%), per capita income ($44,318 compared to $42,164, a difference of 5.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,631 compared to $90,137, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $52,594, a difference of 0.25%), median earnings ($46,190 compared to $46,440, a difference of 0.54%), and median household income ($84,691 compared to $83,582, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 18.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 15.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.66%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 19.4%), married-couple households (45.5% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and currently married (45.6% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.6%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 45.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 6.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.3%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 9.0%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.1% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.12%), 7th grade (95.4% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and 10th grade (92.9% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.0%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.8%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.53%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.88%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.5%).