Czechoslovakian vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 154,664,573 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.223% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 222.9 Ghanaians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 26.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $90,137, a difference of 5.5%), and median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $52,810, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($46,658 compared to $46,440, a difference of 0.47%), householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $60,043, a difference of 0.90%), and median household income ($84,965 compared to $83,582, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 35.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 31.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.95%), single female poverty (21.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 25.4%), female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.1%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 18.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 33.3%), married-couple households (48.5% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 14.9%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.6%), family households (64.6% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 110.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 35.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 10.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 24.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 32.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 57.8%), master's degree (14.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and ged/equivalency (87.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (46.0% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 0.37%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 39.3%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 25.2%), and male disability (12.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.1%).