Bhutanese vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,390,405 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.181. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to an increase of 2.2 Ghanaians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($109,520 compared to $90,137, a difference of 21.5%), median family income ($119,800 compared to $98,877, a difference of 21.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $97,277, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $40,429, a difference of 8.0%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $52,594, a difference of 8.5%), and median earnings ($52,297 compared to $46,440, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 51.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 49.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 11.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and single mother poverty (25.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.9%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 48.6%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 22.9%), and married-couple households (49.3% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.1%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households with children (27.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 88.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 48.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 9.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 23.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 36.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 42.0%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 28.0%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.79%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.80%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.95%), male disability (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.0%).