Immigrants from Oceania vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Oceania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ghanaian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Oceania

Ghanaians

Average
Fair
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,403
SOCIAL INDEX
21.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
261st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ghanaian Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,687,242 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.411. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to a decrease of 15.7 Ghanaians.
Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Ghanaian Communities

Immigrants from Oceania vs Ghanaian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 14.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,623 compared to $90,137, a difference of 8.3%), and median family income ($106,453 compared to $98,877, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $40,429, a difference of 0.33%), householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $52,594, a difference of 2.1%), and median earnings ($47,617 compared to $46,440, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Ghanaian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from OceaniaGhanaian
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,220
Poor
$42,164
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,453
Poor
$98,877
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,100
Fair
$83,582
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,617
Average
$46,440
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,712
Poor
$52,810
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,297
Excellent
$40,429
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,680
Good
$52,594
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,623
Tragic
$90,137
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,705
Poor
$97,277
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,416
Fair
$60,043
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.6%
Exceptional
22.3%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Ghanaian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 22.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 19.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 2.3%), single female poverty (20.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 5.1%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Ghanaian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from OceaniaGhanaian
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Tragic
13.9%
Families
Good
8.7%
Tragic
10.3%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Average
13.3%
Tragic
14.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.7%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Tragic
14.4%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.9%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
18.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
16.0%
Tragic
18.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Good
20.7%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Poor
16.7%
Single Mothers
Good
28.7%
Fair
29.4%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.4%
Tragic
12.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.4%
Tragic
14.0%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Ghanaian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 18.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.5%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Ghanaian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from OceaniaGhanaian
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Males
Average
5.3%
Tragic
6.1%
Females
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.2%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Ghanaian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.97%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Ghanaian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from OceaniaGhanaian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
37.9%
Tragic
35.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.1%
Good
83.0%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Ghanaian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 24.9%), births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 12.0%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.19%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Ghanaian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from OceaniaGhanaian
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.9%
Tragic
42.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Tragic
7.8%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Tragic
42.9%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.6%
Tragic
34.3%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 69.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 45.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 8.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 20.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 33.3%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from OceaniaGhanaian
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Tragic
16.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Tragic
83.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.5%
Tragic
48.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.8%
Tragic
16.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
5.2%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Ghanaian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.0%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (45.8% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.36%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Ghanaian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from OceaniaGhanaian
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Tragic
97.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Tragic
92.8%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Tragic
91.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.9%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.8%
Tragic
87.7%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.5%
Tragic
84.3%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.6%
Poor
63.9%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Fair
58.4%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.3%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.7%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Fair
4.3%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Average
1.8%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Ghanaian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 24.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.7%), and male disability (11.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 0.44%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.64%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Ghanaian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from OceaniaGhanaian
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Fair
11.4%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Good
12.1%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Poor
24.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Fair
47.5%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Average
2.5%