Immigrants from Norway vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Norway
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ghanaian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Norway

Ghanaians

Good
Fair
7,420
SOCIAL INDEX
71.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
117th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,403
SOCIAL INDEX
21.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
261st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ghanaian Integration in Immigrants from Norway Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,715,191 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Immigrant from Norway communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.727. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Norway within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.681% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Norway corresponds to an increase of 681.0 Ghanaians.
Immigrants from Norway Integration in Ghanaian Communities

Immigrants from Norway vs Ghanaian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,217 compared to $42,164, a difference of 23.8%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 22.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,629 compared to $90,137, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,984 compared to $52,594, a difference of 3.2%), median female earnings ($42,837 compared to $40,429, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,118 compared to $60,043, a difference of 10.1%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Ghanaian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from NorwayGhanaian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,217
Poor
$42,164
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,847
Poor
$98,877
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,846
Fair
$83,582
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,758
Average
$46,440
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,628
Poor
$52,810
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,837
Excellent
$40,429
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,984
Good
$52,594
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$106,629
Tragic
$90,137
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,669
Poor
$97,277
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,118
Fair
$60,043
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
22.3%

Immigrants from Norway vs Ghanaian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 39.0%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 27.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 0.23%), single father poverty (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.62%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.9%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Ghanaian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from NorwayGhanaian
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
13.9%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
10.3%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Excellent
12.8%
Tragic
14.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.4%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
14.4%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.3%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
18.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
18.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Good
20.8%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.8%
Poor
16.7%
Single Mothers
Average
29.3%
Fair
29.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.5%
Tragic
12.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
14.0%

Immigrants from Norway vs Ghanaian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 17.5%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.7%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.8%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Ghanaian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from NorwayGhanaian
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.0%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.1%
Females
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.5%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.2%

Immigrants from Norway vs Ghanaian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Ghanaian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from NorwayGhanaian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.6%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.2%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.9%
Tragic
35.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.5%
Good
83.0%

Immigrants from Norway vs Ghanaian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 40.9%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.3%), and births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.2%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.29, a difference of 4.5%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Ghanaian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from NorwayGhanaian
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.5%
Tragic
42.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.8%
Currently Married
Good
47.2%
Tragic
42.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.9%
Tragic
34.3%

Immigrants from Norway vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 43.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 16.0%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from NorwayGhanaian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
16.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Tragic
83.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.4%
Tragic
48.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
19.0%
Tragic
16.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Tragic
5.2%

Immigrants from Norway vs Ghanaian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 41.4%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 37.1%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.77%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.79%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Ghanaian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from NorwayGhanaian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
92.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Tragic
91.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.5%
Tragic
87.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Tragic
84.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.2%
Poor
63.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.7%
Fair
58.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.2%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.5%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.8%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.0%
Fair
4.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Average
1.8%

Immigrants from Norway vs Ghanaian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 24.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 10.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.0%), female disability (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Ghanaian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from NorwayGhanaian
Disability
Good
11.6%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Average
11.3%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.8%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.8%
Poor
24.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Fair
47.5%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Average
2.5%