Australian vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,857,164 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.532. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.405% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 404.8 Ghanaians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 26.1%), per capita income ($52,074 compared to $42,164, a difference of 23.5%), and median family income ($118,440 compared to $98,877, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $52,594, a difference of 2.2%), median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $40,429, a difference of 7.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $60,043, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 45.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 33.0%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.070%), single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 22.9%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 40.8%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 16.0%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.99%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.29, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 62.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 7.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 18.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 58.1%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 38.5%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 24.1%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 14.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.40%), female disability (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.8%).