Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,263,799 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.076% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to a decrease of 76.4 Ghanaians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $42,164, a difference of 22.8%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 22.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $90,137, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $52,594, a difference of 3.3%), median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $40,429, a difference of 7.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $60,043, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 44.7%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 34.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.9%), single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.4%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.3%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 0.92%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 47.4%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 20.6%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.060%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.29, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 39.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 13.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 5.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 40.4%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 37.0%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.78%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.88%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.95%), and disability (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.0%).