Choctaw vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,388,755 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.219. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.032% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 32.2 Ghanaians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 26.0%), median female earnings ($33,775 compared to $40,429, a difference of 19.7%), and median household income ($69,947 compared to $83,582, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $52,810, a difference of 10.6%), householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $60,043, a difference of 13.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $90,137, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (17.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 28.1%), single female poverty (27.2% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 26.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 2.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 18.9%), unemployment (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.0%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.1%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (64.9% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 108.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 48.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 10.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 23.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 40.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 41.1%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 40.8%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (87.8% compared to 87.7%, a difference of 0.13%), 12th grade, no diploma (89.8% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and 11th grade (91.8% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 78.4%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 55.1%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.93%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.0%).