Immigrants from Latvia vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,328,922 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.592. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.122% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 122.5 Ghanaians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $42,164, a difference of 20.7%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 19.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,522 compared to $90,137, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $52,594, a difference of 1.7%), median female earnings ($43,099 compared to $40,429, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $60,043, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 34.9%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 30.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 1.8%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.3%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 43.2%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.2%), and births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.4%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.29, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 36.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 38.0%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 37.4%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.77%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 15.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.3%).