Japanese vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,107,310 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Japanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.086. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Japanese corresponds to an increase of 9.4 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Japanese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,624 compared to $71,697, a difference of 27.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,834 compared to $75,945, a difference of 27.5%), and per capita income ($39,870 compared to $32,345, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 1.4%), householder income over 65 years ($57,919 compared to $59,383, a difference of 2.5%), and median family income ($97,288 compared to $82,064, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Japanese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 67.5%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 57.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.10%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Japanese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 154.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 121.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 117.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Japanese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Japanese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 34.0%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 23.9%), and family households with children (29.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 0.89%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 28.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 21.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Japanese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 59.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 30.2%), and bachelor's degree (33.3% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (82.4% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.47%), college, under 1 year (61.5% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 38.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 27.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 0.84%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and female disability (12.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.5%).